Raising the Bar, Learning from Failure, and Other Lessons from Steve

After a crazy couple of weeks in the consumer electronics/smartphone/computer/telecom mega-industry (it’s really all one now), another bombshell arrived yesterday with the news that Steve Jobs has resigned as CEO and is taking on role of chairman of the board. In reality, it probably means he will be in an advising capacity not unlike what he’s probably been doing for the last year while on medical leave. But still, a shock to the system.

The fact that he’s been able to carry on having any significant executive role at Apple is testament to how passionate and dedicated he is to the company. For quite a long time now he’s had another full-time job (and I’m not talking Pixar or being on the board of Disney): fighting cancer. Best wishes to you in that challenge, Steve.

There’s a lot of speculation on how Apple will do now that Jobs is no longer at the helm. I for one think it will do just fine for quite a while - it’s got a very solid culture that will endure, huge momentum in the market, no debt, probably the strongest brand in the world, and the upper hand in almost every market it’s in.

Setting the Bar Crazy High

All of us in the design and innovation biz have a lot to thank Steve Jobs for. He opened up the play space for us by setting the bar so ridiculously high. This did several things:

• It set a standard for quality, invention, and consistency that inspired others (including us at frog), and allowed much greater latitude for pushing the boundaries of form, materials and interactions. A staple of client requests in the last decade has been “I want the iPod of [my category]” (which became “I want the iPhone of…” and then “iPad of…”). Meaning of course that they didn’t want a literal iPod, but they wanted the same kind of game-changing product, business opportunity, and user experience which these devices came to represent. Most companies, however, underestimate how difficult that is to do from a cultural, technical, organizational, and business perspective (especially if you want to do this repeatedly, not just a one-off).
• It changed people’s expectations for design, products and experiences even in categories far beyond the ones Apple plays in. A good example is the current trend of consumerization of IT, where expectations about ease of use, flexibility, and joy of use from consumer applications are now being forced onto staid IT systems. Why does the online expense-filing application my company pays a lot of money for have to suck so bad, when the free site I use for sharing photos handles so much more complexity so much more easily?

Failure Can Make You Stronger

In 1965, the Apollo 1 spacecraft caught fire while still on the launchpad, killing all three astronauts. It was a televised, very public failure for NASA as it desperately tried to overtake the Russians for the race to the moon. While it was tragic, it also prompted a critical reassessment of the program that ultimately made it better. Retired astronaut John Young said, “I can assure you if we had not had that fire and rebuilt the command module … we could not have done the Apollo program successfully. So we owe a lot to Gus, and Rog and Ed. They made it possible for the rest of us to do the almost-impossible.”

Jobs has been quite open about the fact that after he was fired from Apple, he went through a difficult period. But ultimately this made him a better leader, and he returned to the company after eleven years quite a different person than he had left it. I think it’s fair to say that Apple is a better and more successful company now than if he’d been at the helm for the entire time.

In his humble, inspiring speech to the graduating class at Stanford, he put it this way:

So at 30 I was out. And very publicly out. What had been the focus of my entire adult life was gone, and it was devastating. […]

I didn’t see it then, but it turned out that getting fired from Apple was the best thing that could have ever happened to me. The heaviness of being successful was replaced by the lightness of being a beginner again, less sure about everything. It freed me to enter one of the most creative periods of my life. […]

I’m pretty sure none of this would have happened if I hadn’t been fired from Apple. It was awful tasting medicine, but I guess the patient needed it. Sometimes life hits you in the head with a brick. Don’t lose faith. I’m convinced that the only thing that kept me going was that I loved what I did. You’ve got to find what you love. And that is as true for your work as it is for your lovers. Your work is going to fill a large part of your life, and the only way to be truly satisfied is to do what you believe is great work. And the only way to do great work is to love what you do. If you haven’t found it yet, keep looking. Don’t settle. As with all matters of the heart, you’ll know when you find it. And, like any great relationship, it just gets better and better as the years roll on. So keep looking until you find it. Don’t settle.”

Spend a lunch break watching the whole thing if you haven’t, it’s worth your while:

The iPad is Not a New Idea

The notion of a casual computer (as my colleague Mark Rolston described the iPad to the Wall Street Journal) is actually not a new one. Companies of all shapes and sizes have been trying to figure it out for quite a long time (including Steve Jobs and Apple…since 1983). It’s only now that the technologies required to make it happen have become ubiquitous and cheap enough to make it feasible: wireless and wi-fi, good large touchscreens, low-power but powerful chips, web browsing and email embedded into everyday (everyhour) life, and long-lived batteries.

[Photos by Mark Serr]

I actually worked on a precursor to the iPad back in 1999 or so (I also designed the original iPhone, but that’s another story). This was for a start-up called Qubit, and it only got to prototype stage, but it was fun while it lasted. Even back then it was easy to see that a small tablet could make computing feel much less like work and much more like reading a magazine - something done in spurts and interruptible by family needs.

The intention of the Qubit tablet was actually quite similar to the iPad - casual web and email. Of course back in 1999, the web was still new for a lot of people, and email was not nearly the firehose that it is today. IM, social networking, photo sharing and music streaming were either just for teen early adopters or non-existent. Wi-fi was just starting to become more common in homes, but data usage over wireless was a foreign concept. So the use-case for it was a harder sell, especially at the high price the tablet would have to have sold for given it’s “large” 7-inch or so LCD.

High quality large capacitive touchscreens didn’t exist then, so we had to use a stylus, like a Palm. I designed this little “inkwell” on the side that held the pen either flush to the case, or tilted out for ready usage.

Because the touchscreen was limited, gestures to swipe pages was impossible. Hard buttons to easily scroll, a la Kindle, were used instead, placed where the user’s thumb would be. Because of the hassle of the stylus, we tried to make as much of the high-usage functionality as possible quickly accessible with buttons, without overloading the device with too much complexity.

Like the iPad, the Qubit was intended as a supplement to a desktop or laptop computer. At 1999 prices this was not an attractive proposition. But he question still remains today - if someone has dropped $1500+ on a MacBook, $200+ on an iPhone (plus ~$70/month for fees), will they also be up for spending another $500+ (plus perhaps $30/month in fees) for the times when they don’t feel like pulling out the laptop or the iPhone is just too small?

Only time will tell.

Apple is the Zeitgeist Company

The launch of the iPad yesterday put an exclamation mark on an increasingly obvious point: Apple is the company that has captured the cultural zeitgeist. The massive hype leading up to the event - apparently achieved in a groundswell with very little effort on Apple’s part - shows that they really are the “It” company right now.

Not so long ago, Google claimed that position. The amount of press ink (literal or virtual) that Google has been able to create every single day for the last decade is just astonishing - it is not uncommon to see two or three articles on the same day about some aspect of Google’s business, whether it be a new product or another story about the Googleplex’s free food. No other organization, save perhaps Obama’s election campaign, can claim such a blanket of coverage on such a consistent basis.

But the honeymoon is over and we are in the midst of a mild backlash against Google, and at the same time Apple’s cultural and financial stock has been climbing. No-one sees them as just a maker of over-priced niche products for designery types anymore. They are truly a mainstream mass-culture company that, while focused mostly on consumer electronics, touches into so many other areas of our lives simply because the boundaries between computers, electronics, media, communications and social life have all blurred so thoroughly.

Looking back over the decades, we can see a string of companies that have managed to go beyond being just successful business enterprises and have captured something special in the culture. GM perhaps epitomized this in the 1950’s and 60’s, summed up by the well-known phrase “What’s good for General Motors is good for the country”. GM helped shape the aesthetic and cultural agenda in a way that reached far beyond the automotive realm.

IBM arguably held this position in the 1970’s, and Microsoft in the late 80’s and early 90’s, to be superseded by Google at the turn of the millennium. But none of the tech companies besides Apple have quite been able to win hearts in the same way GM did.

But one thing that all these companies have in common is strong leaders who are not just good business thinkers but are also active in the weeds of product development. Think of Harley Earl at GM, Thomas Watson Jr. at IBM, Bill Gates at Microsoft, Sergey/Larry/Eric at Google, and of course Steve Jobs at Apple. These men all recognized that there is a clear connection between a company’s strategies and the details of the products they bring to market. Ignoring the latter is a good way to scuttle the former.

The iPad is but the latest result of the hand of Steve (with help from a huge team of people of course). The apparent ease with which hype appeared around it is in fact no accident: Apple has invested enormous amounts of work over the years to build a reputation around its products and brand, and that investment is now paying off in spades. Jobs himself is well tapped into the cultural zeitgeist, he transfers that to Apple’s products and strategies, and in turn the company comes to reflect and even steer the zeitgeist.

It’s not magic, but it is hard to do. Very hard. If history is any indication, there is room for only one such company at a time to hold this pre-eminent position, and their time in the sun is temporary. Apple’s winning streak will come to an end, but in the meantime they deserve all the credit they get.