A Big Inauguration Winner: J Crew

J Crew has done well after it got all the attention from the Obama ladies’ wadrobes after the Inaugruation. Their web traffic has doubled since inauguration day on January 20th, by far exceeding the traffic they got in the run-up to Christmas. (gap.com shown for comparison)

What a day

Image courtesy wikipedia commons

Really an amazing day, today, January 20th, Barack Obama officially became the 44th President of the United States. So much joy all around.

Sharp as ever, Obama’s team has wasted no time updating the whitehouse.gov website. (So far as I can tell, it was updated faster than his wikipedia page, which took a good 25 mins to reflect his change from president-elect.)

Obama: The New Lifestyle Brand

Obama is the new Gap/LL Bean/Boca Wear/Nike/Williams Sonoma (pick your affiliation). From two separate emails I got these two offers:

The Mystery of the Blue Goose

What with all the Presidential transition stuff going on, it renewed my interest in the Presidential lectern. It’s got a very distinctive shape and has become a minor icon in itself, a physical symbol of American power that is consistently used at press conferences, and at speeches around the US and throughout the world.

I have been wondering who designed it, but so far have not been able to find anything about that. It’s another one of those examples of anonymous governmental design, like tax forms and the post office logo, that just appear and seep into culture.

There are a couple of interesting factoids I found out about it though:

• It is known as the Blue Goose, and originated with Bill Clinton
• It travels around the world on the same plane that carries all enormous amounts of paraphernalia for Presidential travels, such as the limos
• It is armored to stand in the way of assassin’s bullets, and weighs several hundred pounds. This may also explain why it is unusually tall for a lectern, it covers more of the body.

If anyone has any knowledge on who designed it (I’m guessing deep in the bowels of some government department), I’d appreciate hearing.

Related articles

• Show Time book excerpt
• Photos of before and after renovation of the White House Press Briefing Room

Triumph of the Election Nerds

This was the nerdiest election ever. The amount of data collected and analyzed in a public way on blogs, news sites, and television was unprecedented. And it wasn’t just the quantity of the data, but the amount of insider talk on mathematical models about how to crunch the numbers that was new this cycle.

There’s always been discussion about how to interpret polls, how to treat exit polls with caution, and so on. But this year was a whole different ballgame. Compared to 2004 when individual polls held sway (such as Zogby famously predicting, wrongly, that Kerry would win), this cycle has been dominated by meta-pollsters — analysts who aggregate together dozens of polls in various ways. Judging by the success of this method, we can expect this to be the future.

While some sites such as Pollster.com have been doing this for a while, it was newcomer Nate Smith of fivethirtyeight.com who became the poster boy and constant presence on talk shows. Smith used to work for Baseball Prospectus, a firm of math nerds that makes projections about baseball teams and players, and he famously predicted that the Tampa Bay Rays would win 90 games this season, which seemed ridiculous considering they’d lost 96 games in 2007. In fact the The Tampa Bays exceeded Silver’s projection by winning 97 games and narrowly lost the World Series.

Whereas Pollster.com tracks trend lines of polls to provided a blended assessment, fivethirtyeight.com uses a variety of methods to weight various polls, and mixes in data about demographic trends per region. Silver discusses the modeling that he does on the site (without giving away all the secrets), and the site itself is an orgy of dense charts and statistics, leavened by good writing and photography.

How did he do? Well, as of this writing three of the states are still toss-ups, but his model nailed every single other state. The chart below shows his Monday projection (including three states that would be tossups, 2 of which are still being counted, 1 day after the election), followed by a chart of the actual outcome from The New York Times. Pretty impressive.

Related Articles

• New York Magazine profile of Nate Silver
• FiveThirtyEight.com’s discussion of its pollster ratings