Vote for Change

America and the world can’t live with another 4 years of right-wing conservative hypocrisy, divisiveness, lying, secretiveness, and disastrous economic and international policies. That’s why I endorse Obama for President. Get involved, or donate now.


About Me

I’m a product strategist and writer. In my day job, I’m Director of Product Strategy at frog design. I also write for Cnet on the Matter/Anti-Matter blog. This is my personal blog and does not represent the views of frog or Cnet. More details >

Recent Writing and Speaking

Interviewed by Jess McMullin of BplusD

Sustainable Design Seminar, Design Management Institute

Design Green Now, Bellingham, WA 

Panelist, UT Austin Sustainable Business Summit 

The System is the Product / Speaker at Inverge 2007 Conference

The System is the Product / Presentation to Silicon Valley PMA 

The Tragedy of the Commons, frog Design Mind

Entries from September 1, 2006 - October 1, 2006

Friday
29Sep

Design Classic: Canon T90 SLR

scan.jpg
The big photography equipment tradeshow, Photokina, is going on in Germany at the moment, and the photo world is abuzz with the various announcements, one of which is a new Canon digital SLR. Though today I shoot with a Pentax digital SLR my first high-end SLR was a Canon, and I still have it: a Canon T90. I’m never going to get rid of it even though it’s film-based and manual focus because it’s a wonderful example of machinery as art object.

There are few products that have had as profound an effect on their category as the T90 had on the modern SLR, not the least of which is the interface paradigm that it introduced and which is copied almost verbatim on every SLR (and many point and shoots) on the market today, 20 years later. Some parts of it interface are common-place on many products beyond cameras as well, such as Blackberries.

The enduring thing about the T90 is its aesthetics. If you look at it you’ll see what Canon SLR’s have looked like for the last twenty years.

colani.jpgChances are you’ve never heard of the T90. It had the unfortunate luck of being introduced right before the EOS cameras, which were Canon’s response to the autofocus Minolta Maxxums, and which basically obsoleted the entire line of manual-focus Canons of which the T90 was almost at the top of the stack. But it was a highly advanced camera, even by today’s standards: 4000th/sec maximum shutter speed, sustained 4.5 frames per second, and sophisticated exposure programs. But boy was it heavy! The T90 was so overbuilt that was called “the tank” in Japan and until quite recently was still found photographing in war zones.

Designed in a collaboration between Luigi Colani and Canon’s in-house ID team, the T90 represented a 180 degree change in the way cameras were operated. A side by side comparison of the T90 and its predecessor, the AE-1 (considered a leap forward in its own right) clearly shows the interface differences.

t90_ae1.jpg
On the AE-1 all the controls are done with knobs, and each control (shutter, aperture, ISO, exposure compensation, etc.) gets its own knob. On the T90 the concept of the thumbwheel combined with mode controls was introduced. It was an early example of modal interface, and in some respects they went a bit too far - some fairly frequently used actions were a bit awkward to do as they required two hands. But the thumbwheel was a revelation, located behind the shutter button it allowed rapid control of many different functions in a way that was highly intuitive. Every high-end SLR today uses this same model, as well as many Sony products (a lot of people probably think Sony came up with it, but to my knowledge the T90 represents its first use) and the aforementioned Blackberry.

t90_front.jpgThe other wonderful and enduring things about the T90 are its aesthetics and ergonomics. If you look at it you’ll see what Canon SLRs have looked like for the last twenty years - they’ve basically been playing from that same songbook that Colani composed. In fact I feel they’ve never topped the T90 in the looks department - it has an evocative personality that combines futuristic, menacing and sexy all in one.

It celebrated its polycarbonate goodness in a way that earlier cameras had been embarassed to do for fear of not looking professional enough. Its sculpted form was a massive departure from anything that had come before (though not as far out as other concepts that Colani explored), and while the camera is heavy it is well balanced, the grip is terrific, and most controls fall readily to hand.

There are several really nice details about the T90 that make it a true 360 degree treat to look at and hold, and which reveal themselves in layers over time. I just love the way the back panel hinges and arcs against the side panel door, causing it to open up in unison. It’s got such a great fluid motion to it, and the side panel has a satisfying snap when it springs back closed:

t90-composite.jpg 

eos1.jpgThe pentaprism design has become iconic and is still mimiced on the latest and greatest Canon SLRs such as the EOS 1DSII shown here. You’ll clearly see the styling carry-overs from the Colani design done 20+ years ago.

If you’re not bored stiff by now and want to find out more, the authoritative website on the T90 is this Malaysian one.
Canon’s history museum tells more about the development process with some great old pictures of the development process (and for industrial designers educated in the last ten years, you’ll see how it was in the “old” days).

(The dramatically lit detail pictures at the top of the article are from a scan I found of the large glossy book that Canon produced to promote the T90 - it’s something of a collector’s item now and I’m kicking myself for not having kept mine, which I got while I was working at a photo store at the time I bought the camera.)


Wednesday
27Sep

Logical Yet Unpredictable

spock.jpg“There is an ancient Vulcan saying: Only Nixon could go to China.”
    - Spock

At work we do a lot of thinking about creating sustained competitive advantage for our clients. One of the best ways to do that is to crack the wicked problems that exist in their industry. What this opens up is the ability to be logical yet unpredictable.

Being seen as logical yet unpredictable (LYU) is of vital importance to sustained advantage in today’s hyper-competitive markets because it achieves two things:

  1. It delights customers by bringing to market things they didn’t know they wanted but can’t live without, and which match their expectations of your brand
  2. It infuriates competitors by staying one step ahead of them and taking control of the rules of competition. Competitors are constantly kept off balance.

Wicked problems provide a foundation for LYU because by solving them you gain a deep level of understanding into people’s needs and what your business is really about (in a Xerox-we’re-not-just-copiers-but-about-documents kind of way). You get to look underneath the surface and see how things can or could work at a more fundamental level. You become aware of the trunk on which the branch of your business sits, which allows you to travel back to the trunk and go down a different branch, or even create a whole new branch. This growth will seem a logical fit for your brand and make sense to your customers because you’re still obviously coming from the same tree.

Google has to be the current master of this practice; while the general logic of their strategy is becoming clearer the specifics are still unpredictable. Yahoo is rapidly improving, but achieving it more with fast-follower aquisitions of small companies (such as they are trying to do with Facebook) rather than home-growing it.

mrclean.jpgThe Mr. Clean products that P&G has been introducing, such as the car washing hose attachment, are a great example of LYU: a great fit with the Mr. Clean brand, but a completely unpredictable diversion from their long past legacy of being simple floor-wash soap.

In contrast, over at Gillette there is little tolerance for unpredictability it seems. As I’ve written before, the 5-bladed razor they introduced a while back was so logical and predictable that The Onion jokingly predicted it a year ahead of time:

Sure, we could go to four blades next, like the competition. That seems like the logical thing to do. After all, three worked out pretty well, and four is the next number after three. So let’s play it safe. Let’s make a thicker aloe strip and call it the Mach3SuperTurbo. Why innovate when we can follow? Oh, I know why: Because we’re a business, that’s why!

What part of this don’t you understand? If two blades is good, and three blades is better, obviously five blades would make us the best fucking razor that ever existed. Comprende? We didn’t claw our way to the top of the razor game by clinging to the two-blade industry standard. We got here by taking chances. Well, five blades is the biggest chance of all.

Gosh, that makes Schick’s job easier doesn’t it? I think I see some disruption on the horizon…


Tuesday
19Sep

Going to Spark UX

I’ll be at the Microsoft Spark UX conference/workshop (confshop? workerence?) in Half Moon Bay the first few days in October. If any of my world-straddling readers are also attending, look me up! I’ll be easy to spot, I’ll be the least technically knowledgeable guy in the room.


Monday
18Sep

Penguin Books: Disruptive Design and Distribution

penguin1.jpg
As Larry Keeley at Doblin Group likes to say, product innovation is one of the most over-rated and over-used approaches to innovation. There are many other areas of an organization that can benefit from a focus on innovation. One of those that is done less often is to change your distribution channel, say from one type of store to another (specialty to big-box) or from indirect to direct.

There are probably many reasons why this is the case, but off the top of my head I can think of three:

  1. It’s a high risk proposition: it directly impacts your top line with potentially catastrophic effects in the near term, and possibly long term as well
  2. It’s very expensive to change, as all your sales and marketing efforts tend to be aligned around certain channels, and when you change you affect all their cost structures
  3. Retail channels are all about relationships, and when you change you have to create brand new relationships (often requiring expensive new staff or consultants to help), and you risk losing (ie, pissing off) the ones you’ve spent years building up to get a good level of trust and benefit.

This largely explains why companies who are new to a market are more likely to explore alternate distribution models. Think of Progressive Insurance with its direct web-based model, or Netflix with its, er, web-based model.

But both of these companies have also been innovative with their “product” offering, as well as how they have distributed it. They have taken advantage of the new opportunities presented by rethinking the distribution channel, their lack of baggage of historic distribution methods, and used these to shape a new-to-world product.

Long before Amazon changed the world of book selling, and Lulu threatens to change the world of book making, another company rethought how books are designed and sold: 71 years ago, Penguin books came in to existence because of a realization of an unmet need, as described on Penguin’s website:

Penguin was the brainchild of Allen Lane who was then a director of [publishing house] The Bodley Head. After a weekend spent with Agatha Christie in Devon, Lane searched Exeter station’s bookstall for something to read on his journey back to London, but found only popular magazines and reprints of Victorian novels. Following this, he recognised the need for good quality contemporary fiction at an attractive price. Lane was determined that the new range be available not just in traditional bookshops, but also in railway stations and chain stores such as Woolworths.

The first Penguin paperbacks appeared in the summer of 1935 and were a mix of biography, crime writing and novels. Genres were indicated by the colour of the band on the cover, biography being dark blue, crime green and fiction orange. All the titles were by contemporary writers including Ernest Hemingway, Eric Linklater and Agatha Christie. They cost just sixpence, the same price as a packet of cigarettes.

The site goes on to imply why the Penguin model was “unthinkable” to established publishers:

Within twelve months, Penguin had sold a staggering 3 million paperbacks, but was generally viewed with suspicion and uncertainty by traditional publishers. Hardback fiction sold at seven or eight shillings, and it was feared that the new cheap paperbacks might undermine this market. Some authors were also unsettled by what the advent of Penguin might bring.

An early example of disruptive innovation! Penguin even tried such things as book dispensing machines, known as the Penguincubator.

Note the earlier statement about different colors for different genres. All the Penguin books had a consistent “look and feel” in modern parlance, and did not adopt pictures on their jackets until several years later. This is an important lesson in the power of design: It allows you to quickly create an iconic, recognizable presence if you are new to a market. It’s also an object lesson in taking your “weaknesses” (low budget, poor quality printing and paper) and turning them into strengths. Penguin has been particularly “ruthless” in its application of its visual design language, making its standard lines consistently recognizable from a train-car length away. As the International Herald Tribune noted:

The arrival of Jan Tschichold, the German graphic designer, in 1947 transformed Penguin. He wrote a strict set of rules governing every element of design and ensured that they were enforced by editors and printers. In three years, he established Penguin as an exemplar of modern book design.

Penguin is also surely one of the earliest examples of brand tiering done so overtly in the book segment, introducing brand extensions like the Pelican, Puffin, King Penguin, and Penguin Classics lines. Interestingly, Penguin is a successful example of starting at the low tier and working your way up, usually considered the more difficult route. Throughout its history Penguin has also made periodic controversial decisions which have the by-product of keeping it in the public eye: The first publication of the unabridged Lady Chatterley’s Lover by DH Lawrence, and Salman Rushdie’s Satanic Verses are two examples.

I first thought about Penguin in this design/distribution context a year or so ago while I was working with a client who was trying to create a new product line and develop new distribution channels. I ended up not using the Penguin example as it was too remote, but I’ve been intrigued by their history ever since. So I was delighted to see this post at 37signals a little while back that lauded Penguin’s new line of books, Great Ideas, which have striking designs very much in the spirit of the first books 70 years ago, but with a decidedly contemporary edge. So here’s a belated tip of the hat to them.

penguin2.gif 


Monday
18Sep

IKEA Jumps on the Living Bandwagon

ikea1.jpg
I visited my local IKEA over the weekend and picked up one of their 2007 catalogs. It looks like they have jumped on the “living life to the fullest” bandwagon that I talked about in an earlier post. As you can see from the photo above, the front cover is different from the 2006 version in a couple of interesting respects.

First, the “Celebrate Your Everyday Life” tagline is a new feature that doesn’t appear on the 2006 version, where price is the key value proposition. Second, it shows people, whereas the furniture itself is the only element seen in 2006 (in fact, this is the first IKEA catalog I can recall that actually shows people on the cover, though I don’t have any archived so could be wrong on that…).

This is clearly IKEA picking up on the zeitgeist of getting back to focusing on the important things in life where price is important, yes, but price in itself is no longer the end goal. The phrase “everyday life” is interesting as it implies the “small” things in life are important, that it’s not just about the big celebrations like birthdays, anniversaries, family gatherings, holidays, etc. IKEA is well-positioned for this as they have always been more prosaic than exotic.

Inside the catalog the theme is repeated, but with a twist. Whereas the outside is celebratory, the inside is defensive. The phrasing turns to variations on  “Reclaim your life” on key section pages:

ikea4.jpg

ikea3.jpg 

Nuances are added on other pages, such as this one about closet organization products, which does not mention reclaimation explicitly but implies it:

 ikea2.jpg

Given the conversations going on currently about the state of the US economy and how it’s affecting working families, I find this “reclaim” stand by IKEA to be instructive. It speaks to a frustration of the lower-middle class that is IKEA’s prime customer segment with how they have been getting squeezed on money and time, and that they are feeling control over the life slowly slip away. So slowly that it’s hard to consciously articulate, but IKEA is tapping into the undercurrent of frustration that I think is widespread.

The fact that IKEA has stepped away from its price-driven value proposition to one that is more charged with emotionally and “we’re with you!” comraderie I think indicates the reality and pervasiveness of this feeling. After all, IKEA has to develop its messaging for a full year, so I trust that they have done their homework on what motivations and concerns are driving people’s purchase decisions.

IKEA is acknowledging that a features/benefits/price driven proposition is not enough today - perhaps they are feeling pressure from Target with its “cheap and cheerful” campaign (to use a wonderful English phrase)?

Many tech companies slogging it out in maturing markets could take this lesson to heart: don’t get caught flat-footed when your market shifts from being driven from “rational factors” (price, performance, features) to “emotional factors” (meeting my life needs, satisfying my ego, etc.)