Vote for Change

America and the world can’t live with another 4 years of right-wing conservative hypocrisy, divisiveness, lying, secretiveness, and disastrous economic and international policies. That’s why I endorse Obama for President. Get involved, or donate now.


About Me

I’m a product strategist and writer. In my day job, I’m Director of Product Strategy at frog design. I also write for Cnet on the Matter/Anti-Matter blog. This is my personal blog and does not represent the views of frog or Cnet. More details >

Recent Writing and Speaking

Interviewed by Jess McMullin of BplusD

Sustainable Design Seminar, Design Management Institute

Design Green Now, Bellingham, WA 

Panelist, UT Austin Sustainable Business Summit 

The System is the Product / Speaker at Inverge 2007 Conference

The System is the Product / Presentation to Silicon Valley PMA 

The Tragedy of the Commons, frog Design Mind

Entries from July 1, 2007 - August 1, 2007

Sunday
29Jul

Things I'd love to see in PowerPoint

ppt_better.jpg

Here are some things I would love to see PowerPoint do (or Keynote for that matter), instead of minor features upgrades like fuzzy drop shadows. These would make a substantial rather than incremental difference to how efficiently I can put together decks, and how well I can present them in dynamic meetings:

Creating:

  • Extract a single slide from a deck: How often has this happened to you? You’re working on a deck along with someone else. They own the master. You need to make a change to one slide. The only way to get them that one slide is to delete all the slides but this one, save it off as another file, and then email it to them. Why can’t I just extract that one slide and send it directly? Much less risky (since I don’t delete all slides and save), and much faster.
  • Layers and object locking: I do a lot of complex graphics, and try to avoid using another app (OmniGraffle is the usual fallback) just because last minute changes then involve more steps/time. (Yes, I’m perfectly aware of PowerPoint’s shortcomings in how its graphics look…).  It’s time for PowerPoint to introduce layers and object locking so that complex graphics stop becoming such a hair-pulling exercise.
  • Improved zoom: The zoom capability on PowerPoint is a joke for a graphics program. You should be able to zoom in on specific points and do box-zooms. The current scheme is just too time-consuming. Add a real pan function while you’re at it.
  • Group collaboration assistance: Presentations are more often than not team affairs these days, not solo efforts. We need better tools for collaborating on a deck: commenting and mark-up, change tracking, server check-in/check-out. (Keynote has sticky note comments - I haven’t used them so don’t know how effective they are.)

Presenting:

  • Thumbnail view while presenting: If I need to switch to a page quickly I have to go through a multilayer menu that provides little information about which slide is which. A thumbnail/light-table view would be far superior.
  • Tools for non-linear presenting: How often have you wanted to skip to another piece of a deck to follow a tangent thought, or have side-topics available that may or may not come up? The thumbnail view is one approach for this, but other navigation tools would be helpful too. Keyboard shortcuts for back/forth like in a browser, for example, or ability to set bookmarks, or to bring up a dynamic filmstrip of slides. These days most of the client presentations I do are discussion-oriented, I don’t want them to be lectures. Discussions are fluid whereas lectures are (stereotypically) linear, and unfortunately PowerPoint and Keynote follow the latter pattern. Keynote was designed, after all, for Steve’s super-scripted and utterly linear keynotes.
  • Suppress email and IM and calendar notifications: Why can’t one Microsoft product (PowerPoint) take control over others by not letting pop-up notifications get on top of your presentation? Sensitive/confidential information often appears in these, and it’s easy to forget to turn one off.
  • Cover desktop: On a similar note, the presentation app should cover my desktop when mirroring displays. I use the nifty utility DeskShade for the same effect, but it would be great to have it integrated.
  • Text touch-up while presenting: I’ve lost count of the number of times I’ve had to make small changes to text on a slide as part of a client discussion - why should I have to dump back out to the unattractive and jarring creation mode with all its menus and palettes?
  • Better text display: Long the bette-noire of graphic designers (and I hear no end of guff about it from graphic designers at frog), PowerPoint is pure and simple terrible at displaying text in a properly kerned way. Many people, probably most, don’t notice it I suppose, but it still gets under my skin.

If Microsoft were to really look hard at how PowerPoint is used and address the significant workflow issues, it would be a far more usable and pleasant tool. For that matter, it would be great if Apple did the same with Keynote, which is actually disappointing in that it mainly addressed cosmetic issues of presentation visuals rather than taking the usually thorough Apple approach to user needs.

(PS: I use PowerPoint on both Mac and PC, since I have Parallels. I prefer creating in Windows because even on Parallels it is far faster than the Mac. But I prefer presenting on the Mac side of the house because its presenter tools are far superior to the PC version. And yes, hilarious hijinks of incompatabilities and font problems and embedded multimedia do rear their head from time to time.)

 


Sunday
29Jul

Speaking at Silicon Valley PMA

On Wednesday I’ll be speaking at the Silicon Valley Product Management Association in Santa Clara. Sounds like it will be a good crowd, I’m looking forward to meeting everyone. I’ll be talking about “The System is the Product”, and related issues of designing complex ecosystems of products and services. (Related blog post on the topic.)


Sunday
29Jul

Small things can make a big difference

landis.jpg
The 2007 Tour de France wrapped up with Spaniard Alberto Contador taking the yellow jersey - an amazing feet considering he’s only 24 and this was his first Tour. There was yet another round of doping scandals this year which led to the mid-race sacking of then-leader Michael Rasmussen, and yet again more hand-wringing about whether the sport of cycling can recover. When a Rasmussen or a Vinokourov gets pulled because of doping accusations it calls into question all their previous results. (The photo above, by the way, is a shot I took of last year’s <asterisk>winner</asterisk> Floyd Landis as he circles the Champs-Elysées.)

I can’t say I sympathize with doping at all, but it’s clear that riders are willing to take any chance they can to get an edge. What difference does it make? Consider this: Over the 3550 miles of this year’s tour, the difference in average speed between the winner (Alberto Contador) and the rider in last place was less than one mile per hour. That rider, Wim Vansevenant rode the same course but did so in just under four hours more time - 91 hours, 0 minutes and 20 seconds vs. 94 hours, 53 minutes and 20 seconds. (Courtesy of the Tour de France Lanterne Rouge)


Tuesday
17Jul

Normal Programming Should Resume Shortly

Sorry for the slow pace of things around here, caused by a combination of a heavy project load at work and moving house. Should be back to normaly fairly soon.


Wednesday
11Jul

A Super Test

veyron.jpg

In complete contrast to the previous post on the environmental perils of bottled water (I am nothing if not inconsistent), here’s a great piece of video of a test of the current crop of major supercars: Gallardo, Veyron, R8, 997 GT3RS, DB9. Yes, all in one place.

And check out the cool mod StumbleUpon has done with the YouTube player - it dims out (like Lightroom) after a while so you focus on the video. Nice.